LPD-17

---

LPD 17 NAVY/MARINE CORPS WARFIGHTER AND SHIP DESIGNER IPT

CIC/部队行动

研讨会报告II

目录����������������������������..ii
I.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY�����������������������..1
ii。INTRODUCTION���������������������������2
III.讨论����������������������������..3
iv。乐动冠军��������农业研磨
V.ACTION������������������������������.16
A.研讨会议程�����������������������.A-1
B.POC LIST�����������������������������.B-1
C.CIC/部队行动FUNCTIONS��������������������C-1

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• 验证LPD 17上CIC，部队OP和TACLOG空间的功能要求
• 聆听勇士的关注/欲望，以实现CIC/部队OPS（空间/系统安排）的最佳战斗“体系结构”
• Exit with viable design criteria for each space

焦点小组identifyi车间继续ng functions common to CIC and to Troop Ops/TACLOG - only one, command and decision making, appeared to require physical co-location of commanders and then the function only required physical proximity occasionally. With this in mind, NAVSEA representatives Mr. Donnelly and Mr. Douglas) developed a revised strawman space layout. The focus groups reconvened to review the draft design and to identify pertinent issues. Reformed, the members completed the workshop by refining issues pertinent to the revised arrangement. The PMS 317 Team plans to return in January 1998 to review drawings of options relative to space arrangement and to review planned C⁴I systems to meet space requirements. The following IPT actions resulted:

• Taclog功能与部队OP的功能是不可或缺的，不需要永久的物理分离。该空间应恢复为部队操作和物流中心的原始标题，taclog由临时舱壁隔开
• CIC and TOLC should be separated by a temporary bulkhead with direct access between the two spaces to facilitate interaction
• Equal situational awareness information should be provided to both CIC and TOLC to enhance performance of separate and common functions and to limit the need for constant physical co-location
• A common Mission Planning Room should be added to the design for Blue/Green face-to-face interaction during planning when co-location is most critical.

ii。INTRODUCTION

LPD 17 CIC and Troop Ops designs have progressed to the study drawing stage so a fleet/Marine review was considered necessary to create functional definitions for both spaces and to determine if the proposed system/space arrangements satisfy those functions with a particular interest in the value of collocation for some operations. Embodied by the Navy and Marine Corps Warfighter and Ship Designer IPT Charter, signed by N85, COMPHIBGRU TWO, COMPHIBGRU THREE, Deputy MARFORLANT and Deputy CG I MEF, the IPT met on 16-17 October 1997 at the LPD 17 War Room (EWTGLANT, Little Creek). The charter directed the IPT to:

• Identify and validate the functions of CIC, Troops Ops, and TACLOG.

• Develop design concepts for space configuration and arrangement to meet the charter's objective.

• Develop a set of recommendations.

• Brief potential design options to leadership

• Refine or revise concepts as appropriate

• Translate concept into detailed space design and LPD 17 DataBase issues so as to begin the CCR (Configuration Change Request) process.

• 验证LPD 17上CIC，部队OP和TACLOG空间的功能要求
• 聆听勇士的关注/欲望，以实现CIC/部队OPS（空间/系统安排）的最佳战斗“体系结构”
• 每个空间都有可行的设计标准退出。

• Establish a common baseline of LPD 17, Design For Ownership, and specific space design background information
• Define the functions of CIC, Troops Ops, and TACLOG
• Link common functions of these three spaces
• 确定哪些常见功能需要物理共同设置，物理访问和/或信息访问要求
• 根据需要建立这些空间和其他空间的一般安排，以最能满足这些要求
• 修改和完善该空间的一般安排，以制定用于NAVSEA实施的设计标准。
• Identify additional relevant issues pertinent to LPD 17 and resolve previously submitted LPD 17 Data Base Issues.

Key IPT members included representatives from Commander Amphibious Group Two, Commander Amphibious Group Three (COMPHIBRON SEVEN), I. MEF/15^thCommunications Officer and G3, USS NASHVILLE, PCO USS OAK HILL, COMSURFWARDEVGRU, SWOSCOLCOM, MCCDC, COMNAVSURFLANT, PEO CLA, PMS 317, NSWC Dahlgren Division, and NAVSEA. The agenda and attendees are provided at Appendices A and B.

返回目录

III. DISCUSSION

概述。RADM (Ret) Picotte, Team 17, welcomed theIPT and provided overview and updates of the LPD 17 Program, extending to the Design for Ownership (DFO) process. In addition, he presented background information on Workshop I, briefed on pending action items from that Workshop and presented unresolved LPD 17 Design For Ownership Data Base Issues relevant to the IPT. He concluded by reinforcing the IPT Charter credo that the "IPT will create concepts that will enable LPD 17 Combat Information Center (CIC) and Troops Operations and Logistics Center (Troop Ops) spaces to support aOne Team, One Fight执行海军探险战役的方法，并使指挥官能够维持直接，持续的对话。乐动冠军

Marine Corps Perspective.PEO CLA的Quinlan上校回应了欢迎，并就太空问题的海军陆战队观点以及战士和船舶设计师IPT提供了想法。乐动冠军除了传达其他背景信息并强调使LPD 17“战士友好”的必要性之外，他建议IPT“思考未来”，并记住“一支球队，一场战斗”。

Design Discussion. Mr. Donnelly and Mr. Douglas followed with key attributes of the background, design considerations and potential paradigms involved in CIC, Troop Operations, and TACLOG. An interesting comparison was drawn between 21st century's LPD 17 and H.M.S. Dreadnought of 1905. Both ships reflect innovative design, technology leaps, enhanced combat systems, and holistic approaches to design. Highlights of the remainder of the presentation are as follows:a. Background.Originally, CIC was meant to be deep inside the ship, but survivability studies indicated that there was less vulnerability within the superstructure so it was moved to the 02 level. The modification to remove CIWS enabled the spaces to be moved up to the 03 level, promoting access to the Pilot House. Troop Operations was originally intended to be only a Tactical Logistics space, TACLOG. However, it was recognized that there were advantages to improving interconnectivity and command and control for embarked Marines or other forces. The space then adopted the dual role of Troop Operations and Logistics Center. When the space was raised to the 03 Level, another space, formerly a CIWS related space, became available outboard of Troop Ops and separated from TOLC by a bulkhead. A bulkhead with door access separated CIC from Troop Ops. 03 Level Configuration shown in Figure 1.

Key attributes of the spaces are listed as follows: (See Figure 2)

CIC- Organized into sensor, weapons, C2, and mission area

- JMCIS and ACDS available at command table

- Utilizes 2 or 3-man command table plus CO behind

- Large screen displays for overall situational awareness

Troop Ops- "Scaled down" Landing Force Operations Center

- JMCIS capable

- 大屏幕显示

-- Same tactical picture as CIC

- Adjacent to CIC

- 船上广泛的区域网络访问以支持USMC要求

- IVCS and 23 TV provide voice connectivity and integrated video package to all operators, Navy and Marine.

b。关注。During Workshop I the need for a bulkhead or the removal of a bulkhead (Figure 3) between CIC and Troops Ops was discussed and several concerns were raised:

- 不应以常规的方式考虑空间配置。当今CIC和TACLOG之间的照明差异在将来不应该是一个问题，因为显示板和ASTAB代替了油脂铅笔。

- Audio interference is probably a greater environmental challenge to sharing CIC and Troops Ops, but a paradigm shift in how we do business may be required. Noise management is of concern in any new arrangement.

- TACLOG should be closer to CIC air control - for information and status sharing. This might require part of TACLOG to be reoriented to be adjacent to CIC vice on the other side of Troop Ops.

- 海军陆战队需要部队行动中的桌子空间。使用任务控制类型的布局 - 海军陆战队应朝着相同的方向面对，专注于面对面的交流。“一支球队 - 一场战斗”

- Personnel sitting at consoles become focused on their task and greatly reduce ambient space noise.

- Ship to shore movement should be tied to Troop Ops

- There needs to be a single location where a Marine or embarked force commander may go to obtain a snapshot of what is happening from air, sea and ground operations to self defense.

c.Paradigms.With respect to these and potential concerns, the workshop briefer's

discussion referred to several related paradigms:

Light

范式：CIC是一个黑暗的空间，可促进地位板和控制台的视野。

Fact: CIC is not specified for low-level blue light - it is to be a low-level white light space and all displays must be clearly visible in that environment

噪音水平

范式：CIC需要低噪声水平，因此应与其他船舶功能保持隔离

Fact: Reduced manning and improved station-to-station communications should reduce ambient noise levels within CIC.

Limited Access Space

范式：CIC是保护机密信息并消除紧急情况下的混乱的有限访问空间

事实：通过关闭CIC和TOLC之间的拟议智能舱壁，可以将CIC隔离为安全或紧急情况。

函数的分离

范式：CIC和TOLC执行不同的功能，应是单独的空间

事实：在两栖操作期间，CIC和TOLC在计划和执行船上运动的情况下提供了相互支持。

Level of Activity

Paradigm: There needs to be a single location where a Marine or embarked force commander may go to obtain a snapshot of what is happening from air, sea and ground operations to self defense at any time

事实：TOLC中的平等信息和情境意识访问将提供准确的快照。另外，活动水平有所不同。在正常的下道条件和特殊操作/船上运动中，CIC保持中度至极端水平。在工作的后期阶段和运送到海岸运动的后期，TOLC的活动水平非常低，提高到极端水平。图4中提供了典型的比较。

d. Workshop Process.After Workshop I, the signed IPT charter called for an initial meeting to prioritize space functions and a second meeting to develop concepts and pro and cons for various space design issues. In Workshop II these meeting were combined and objectives accomplished by the following process:

• Two Focus groups identified CIC, Troop Ops and TACLOG functions
• Focus groups identified common functions that occur in two or more spaces
• Focus groups identified whether the common functions require information access, physical access or physical presence among commanders
• IPT巩固和验证常见功能,creating a single set

Based upon working group-identified functions, the IPT determined the following:

• Co-Location is best served by :
1. physical access
2. equal information access
1. physical presence in planning

• TACLOG functions are an integral part of Troops Operations and the spaces should be

船上移动（串行载荷 - 什么，何时，何时）监视为

Operations, directs Landing Force Logistics, responds to Landing Force requests, and

coordinates with Primary Control Ship (PCS)

• KSQ-1/PLRS should be treated as a sensor - and data is part of the Common Tactical Picture (CTP). Master needs to be located in Troop Ops

• The Boat control in CIC and movement group within TACLOG could be near each other.

• Both spaces need independent control of Large Screen Display (LSD) and ship's

simultaneous (multiple cameras at the same time). Also want independent control of

external communications.

• There is a need for UAV data. LPD 17 will need up-link and downlink to the UAVs and tap into the raw data coming down. Will need to display the data and integrate it with other C4I data (JMCIS and MAGTF C4I).

• CIC should stay as a separate/unique space from the Marine spaces, but there needs to

bulkhead such as is in place on USS CORONADO was recommended

• 传感器和轨道管理功能无需在CIC中执行

• Fligh Deck/Well Deck与Debark交谈，Debark与CIC进行了交谈，CIC与PCS对话，PCS与Taclog对话（XO和CCO处于Debark Control中）

• MAGTF C4I footprint/architecture will get larger/great over time. Functions are

讲习班过程继续：

• Using these functions PMS 317 developed a strawman redesign of the spaces
• 焦点小组审查了Strawman设计并提供评论和建议
• IPT consolidate comments on strawman design and provide to PMS 317.

First CIC and Troop Ops spaces were flip-flopped, CIC moving to the starboard side on the 03 Level. Tracker alley, the track and sensor management area of CIC was moved into the formerly unassigned CIWS space to starboard of CIC (once a possible location for TACLOG). This relocation would provide a secluded area for this function while still remaining accessible from CIC. It was also the best use of this space given the need to retain structural bulkheads.

部队操作和TACLOG将集成到TOLC的部队操作和物流中心。但是，“根据任务要求，两个空间之间将有一个智能的舱壁进行分离。tolc = taclog +部队操作.

At the same time a "smart bulkhead" would separate CIC from TOLC for flexibility in future mission accomplishment. This would also allow direct access between TACLOG and the Primary Control function area of CIC as needed.

A Blue/Green Mission Planning space would be designed on the 02 or 03 levels to provide for direct side-by-side interaction during the critical planning and even execution phases.

Wrap-up.研讨会在研讨会期间审查了未成年问题和新问题。乐动冠军车间我的所有动作项目都被认为是解决的。PMS 317的CDR Barbour感谢与会者的前瞻性思维和接受改变的意愿，从而结束了研讨会。他总结了研讨会的目标及其成就，如下所示：

• Verified functional requirements of CIC/Troop Ops
• Listened to the Warriors' concerns/desires to achieve optimal warfighting architecture of CIC/TROOP OPS (space/system arrangement)
• Exited with viable design criteria plan for each space.

iv。乐动冠军问题

The following issues were raised during the course of the workshop. Those resolved will be entered into the LPD 17 Design for Ownership Issues DataBase for historical documentation. Those requiring resolution or which will impact LPD 17 will also be entered into the LPD 17 Design for Ownership Issues DataBase for further action by the PMS 317 Ownership Team and/or the Configuration Change Board.

1. Debark Control and TACLOG should be co-located on LPD 17. Are windows required in

Debark？TACLOG功能需要与部队OP和邻接的共同座位

CIC（主要控制函数）因此，与Debark的共同点既不需要也不需要。

Windows were determined not to be required in Debark Control although television access is.

1. 如果有同等的信息/情境意识可用，则指挥官（蓝色/绿色/紫色）在CIC/TACLOG/TROOP OPS中的共同定位是绝对必要的在关键任务计划阶段，为并排互动创建了任务计划空间。

1. KSQ-1/PLRS Master Station position. A master station is required in TOLC

1. Sensor Operators and Track Managers do not need to be located in CIC. This was addressed in the revised strawman design where the functions and spaced were moved to an area accessible to CIC, but outboard of it and separated by a bulkhead.

1. LPD 17上需要自由使用远程摄像机，以进行船舶情况意识，例如通道，储藏室，飞行甲板，井甲板，弹药固定，船舶外部？

1. TOLC and CIC require independent control of Large Screen Display (LSD) in their respective spaces (eliminate master/slave console, want independent control)

1. 谁负责关节空间？（是蓝色还是绿色空间）。这是在研讨会中通过不让联合空间而解决的，而是一个具有灵活性的连接空间。

1. Amphibious Operations Space/Warroom/Planning/Briefing Space location. Warroom needs to be located near major C2 spaces (CIC and TOLC) to provide a briefing space/meeting rooms with tactical displays. If the ship gets simultaneous multi-missions, it will provide an area for future planning as CIC and TOLC execute current operations. A smaller layout like the room/space layout on the LHDs (Flag Plot/Crisis Action enter/LFOC) was recommended and it should not be called "Warroom" due to confusion aboard ship.

1. 扬声器仍然是必要的，不应全部被头戴式耳机所取代。

1. 这是任务规划Cente推荐r include:
1. 对情况的意识- internal/external ((JMCIS/GCCS-M/ACDS/MAGTF C4I)
2. VTC
3. CCTV/TV Briefing
4. Display capability/Large Screen Display (LSD)
5. Radio Communications
6. Table and 12 chairs

12. UAV connectivity and display is required for CIC, TOLC, JIC, and Mission Planning Center

13.仍然需要纸张图表和挂在墙上的纸张。

14.建议研究LSD上的定位Debark控制的可行性。借助CIC的CO for IA，XO将需要位于桥上，这样他还是不会在Debark。它还将促进有关所有有关的信息的访问。

15. Need to accommodate AFATDS functionality, What is the MAGTF C4I footprint for the LPD 17? MAGTF C4I equipment tends to be single mission/single function today, so for a multi-mission task, numerous systems will be needed. MAGTF C4I footprint will grow over the next few years until functions get merged in the same workstation.

16. What is the Special Warfare (JSOC/NSW) footprint and architecture? JSOC forces will come with unique radios/antenna and communication equipment. JSOC Forces will be aboard LPD 17 when it is the advance force ship.

17. What are the requirements for UUV/Remote Mine hunter/counter measures connectivity.

18. CIC/TOLC need independent control of lights, speakers, HVAC, etc. for each space.

19.一个额外的问题在这个车间的广告dressed the need for antenna access for

便携式收音机带来了登上部队并为其提供规定，以免影响雷达横截面的注意事项。天线访问的未来增长应包括在规划中包括其他无线电。

20. LPD上的指挥和控制空间需要灵活性，以便能够身体合并以满足21世纪的任务要求。推荐“智能舱壁”，可移动，可折叠的舱壁，这些隔板既是声音和光线隔热，这些舱壁既可以使用，又是在Coronado US CORONADO联合指挥中心使用的，将Taclog与CIC和TROOP OPS分开，以及CIC和CIC和TOLC之间。

21. The IPT supported the concept of consolidating the Combat Systems Maintenance Cental with Damage Control Central to form a single area for monitoring status and repair direction.

22.建议将针对部队操作的马蹄表（图6）丢弃，而倾向于面对单个方向的桌子布置。

The status of previously identified LPD 17 Data Base Issues is recorded in Table 4.

返回目录

V.行动项目

PMS 317 will develop alternative approaches to the space arrangement discussed in Figure 5 along with corresponding C⁴我系统。这些将于1998年1月在第三次研讨会上介绍。

返回目录

16 October 1997

欢迎，LPD 17 RADM（RET）PICOTTE的概述和设计

Ownership update

Marine Corps Perspective COL Quinlan, PEO CLA

LPD 17 Design Process, CIC/TROOP OPS Mr. Douglas, NAVSEA 03K412

Space Design Overview Mr. Donnelly, PMS 317/PEO TAD

空间功能定义焦点组

Functions Review IPT

Strawman Design Presentation Mr. Donnelly, PMS 317/PEO TAD

Strawman Design评论焦点小组

17 October 1997

Strawman Design Review继续Focus Groups

查看改进和比较设计IPT

解决新的和杰出的问题IPT乐动冠军

摘要和总结CDR Barbour，PMS 317

LPD 17主页http://lpd17.nswc.navy.mil

LPD 17/EWTGLANT Warroom: Phone 1-800-445-1916, Fax 757-464-8599

返回目录

CIC (Combat Information Center):Functions common with Troop Ops are bolded.

1. 对情况的意识. Coherent Tactical Picture (CTP) -- needs to be shared between C²spaces and should include Air, Surface, Land, Subsurface, Position Location Information in a Data Fusion format. Information Management (Blue/Green)
2. Sensor and Track Management - can be located elsewhere/different space than CIC
3. 导航
4. Boat Control (ship-to-shore)
5. 空气管制（空气反应，空域管理）
6. 信息管理（英特尔）
7. 武器控制和运输自卫
8. Command and Control(C2) from a mission perspective - two levels

ARG/TF级 - 外部多平台

Communications External (SHF, EHF, UHF, HF, VTC, VHF, etc.)

Primary/Advisory Control (LCAC, AAAV, LCU, etc.), Landing Plan execution

(OTH Ops - LCACs are on their own, not directly controlled by Mother ship)

9。C2WCommand and Control Warfare for C4I

10. Tactical Maneuvering and coordination with other Ships/Units

11.设备配置控制（CSRO）

12. Command (Decision Making)- flexible to support varying activity and able to surge

13.物流和补给(UNREP/VERTREP)

14. SAR - Search and Rescue

15. Mission Planning and Execution

16.内部协调控制（Debark Control，本地空气控制）与外部/ARG控制（PC，LCAC控制，违规部队指挥官，Advance Force Ship等）

TROOP OPS: Those functions that are common with CIC arebolded- those in common with TACLOG are inItalics

1. 连贯的战术图片
2. Intelligence Processing
3. 计划未来
4. Planning Near Term
5. Monitoring
6. Logistics
7. 补给
8. Command
9. 武器协调 - 拆分arg/no sacc
10. Fire Support Monitoring
11. TRAP -Tactical Recovery of Aircraft and Personnel
12. Air Movement Control
13. Coordinate with Primary Control Ship(PCS)